If you can't view the message, please click here.

LLB Bulletin Header
LLB Bulletin #08/2023 8 August 2023

CASE HIGHLIGHTS

KESATUAN EKSEKUTIF CANON OPTO (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD lwn. CANON OPTO (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN, KUALA LUMPUR
INDRA NEHRU SAVANDIAH
PANEL PEKERJA: KHAIRUL ANUAR ABDUL RAHIM
PANEL MAJIKAN: AZZUDDIN BUXTON ABDULLAH
AWARD NO. 1169 TAHUN 2023 [NO. KES: 1-1-696-22]
24 MEI 2023

Abstrak – Penetapan tangga gaji maksima adalah selaras dengan amalan perhubungan perusahaan serta prinsip penetapan gaji. Ini wajib diamalkan oleh majikan walaupun tidak disentuh dalam satu-satu award Mahkamah Perusahaan.

MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN: Award – Ketakpatuhan – Aduan – Aduan oleh Kesatuan Sekerja tentang ketakpatuhan award oleh syarikat – Penyelarasan dan kenaikan gaji tahunan – Sama ada award menetapkan tempoh masa untuk penyelarasan dan kenaikan gaji – Sama ada terma dalam award terpakai apabila tamat tempoh yang ditetapkan – Sama ada terdapat ketakpatuhan oleh syarikat – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 56

KESATUAN SEKERJA: Award – Ketakpatuhan – Penyelarasan dan kenaikan gaji tahunan – Aduan oleh Kesatuan Sekerja tentang ketakpatuhan award oleh syarikat – Sama ada award menetapkan tempoh masa untuk penyelarasan dan kenaikan gaji – Sama ada terma dalam award terpakai apabila tamat tempoh yang ditetapkan – Sama ada terdapat ketakpatuhan oleh syarikat – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 56


NON-METALIC MINERAL PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES’ UNION v. PGF INSULATION SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, PENANG
SURAIYA MUSTAFA KAMAL
EMPLOYEES PANEL: MOHD FAIZAL ABD RAHIM
EMPLOYERS PANEL: BADRULMUNIR BABOO
AWARD NO. 1217 OF 2023 [CASE NO: 9-2-2274-21]
1 JUNE 2023

Abstract – The party that proposes fundamental changes to the pay out of annual bonus and annual increment and seeks to amend salary scale, must prove such proposed changes with valid justifications.

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective agreement – Terms and conditions – Articles – Dispute on articles pertaining to promotion, bonus, annual increment, retrospective benefits and salary scale – Proposals ought to be accepted – Factors considered

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 7 of 2023)

Award Parties Citation Links
  Nesarajah Nadarajah lwn. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor
[Semakan Kehakiman No: WA-25-170-05-2020]
[2023] 3 ILR 1 cljlaw
labourlaw
  Sathiaseelan Nagappan v. Ketua Pengarah, Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
[Civil Appeal No: A-01(A)-412-07-2021]
[2023] 3 ILR 18 cljlaw
labourlaw
1022/2023 Subramaniam Letchimanan v. Embassy Of The United States Of America
[Case No: 6/4-587/19]
[2023] 3 ILR 47 cljlaw
labourlaw
1066/2023 Khairul Amree Ahmad Suhaimi v. TC Management Services Corporation Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 21-4-1012-21]
[2023] 3 ILR 76 cljlaw
labourlaw
1099/2023 How Zheng Hong v. Airasia Berhad
[Case No: 14-4-2123-20]
[2023] 3 ILR 113 cljlaw
labourlaw
1169/2023 Kesatuan Eksekutif Canon Opto (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd lwn. Canon Opto (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
[No. Kes: 1-1-696-22]
[2023] 3 ILR 132 cljlaw
labourlaw
1217/2023 Non-Metalic Mineral Products Manufacturing Employees' Union v. PGF Insulation Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 9-2-2274-21]
[2023] 3 ILR 143 cljlaw
labourlaw
1306/2023 Azhar Abdullah v. Kub Power Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 5-4-2231-21]
[2023] 3 ILR 152 cljlaw
labourlaw
1311/2023 Chen Sio Meng v. IK Plantation Services Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 22(12)/4-125/20]
[2023] 3 ILR 159 cljlaw
labourlaw
1314/2023 Hwang Tchun Chyea v. Tidy Locks & Fittings Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 15(11)-4-351-21]
[2023] 3 ILR 171 cljlaw
labourlaw
1358/2023 Haizal Kamarudin lwn. Malakat Mall Sdn Bhd
[No. Kes: 2-4-37-22]
[2023] 3 ILR 187 cljlaw
labourlaw
1381/2023 Chong Jee Fatt And v. Tee E & C (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 3/4-907/21]
[2023] 3 ILR 204 cljlaw
labourlaw

SUBJECT INDEX

JUDICIAL QUOTES

"Be that as it may, the law cannot be so alienated from nor insulated and isolated from the harsh realities of life and the rough and tumble of it all. The realities of life would include for many the need to travel long distances for those who work outstation so that they may be with their families either on weekends or even a mid-week journey home. In the final analysis, the question that ought to have been asked is whether the journey in commuting is made by the employee because of his work and not for other economic or social pursuits. 

... 

A man’s best investment is still to invest time and energy into his family and to make deposits, as they say, into the emotional bank account of his wife and children. We would be so bold to say that every employer would encourage its employee to build a strong and stable family as part of its corporate social responsibility to its stakeholders which would certainly include its employees." - Per Lee Swee Seng JCA in Sathiaseelan Nagappan v Ketua Pengarah, Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial [2023] 3 ILR 18




Annual   Publish   LLB Blog
         
Hourly   Submit   Training

CLJ WEBSITES

(Available with separate subscription plan)

FOLLOW US

Facebook Twitter Instagram

Feedback
Copyright © 2023 MYLAWBOX Sdn Bhd To unsubscribe click here