If you can't view the message, please click here.

IN THIS ISSUE BULLETIN 04/2021
www.cljlaw.com
www.mylawbox.com
www.labourlawbox.com
(Available with separate subscription plan)





LATEST HIGHLIGHTS
CASE HIGHLIGHTS

ABDUL MUTALIB MOHAMAD v. SWM GREENTECH SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, JOHOR
SUMATHI MURUGIAH
AWARD NO. 43 OF 2021 [CASE NO: 16/4-1646/19]
7 JANUARY 2021

DISMISSAL: Breach of company rules and policies – Bribery – Whether the claimant had accepted a bribe for the transaction involving the 25 RORO bins to USE NESS Enterprise – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Whether the company had successfully proven the charge against him – Whether it had amounted to gross misconduct justifying his dismissal – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse

DISMISSAL: Breach of company rules and policies – Dishonesty – Whether the claimant had handed the said sum to COW2 for the disposal of the company’s 25 RORO bins to USE NESS Enterprise – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Claimant’s defence – Whether acceptable – Whether the company had succeeded in proving the misconduct against him – Whether it had amounted to gross misconduct justifying his dismissal – Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse

DISMISSAL: Misconduct – Whether the claimant had misused the company’s manpower for his personal benefit – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Whether the charges had been proven by the company successfully against him – Whether it had justified his dismissal

DOMESTIC INQUIRY: Procedural impropriety – DI panel composition – One of the panel members lower in rank to the claimant – Claimant not objecting to it either prior to, at the commencement of or during the DI – Effect of – Whether it had neutralised or affected the impartiality of the DI panel members as a whole

EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence – Minutes of the DI – Whether it had been accurate and reliable – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Whether the principles of natural justice had been complied with in the conduct of the DI

MOHD HAFIZUL ABDUL RAHIM v. MALAYSIA AIRLINES BERHAD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, JOHOR
SUMATHI MURUGIAH
AWARD NO. 220 OF 2021 [CASE NO: 16/4-2134/19]
10 FEBRUARY 2021

DISMISSAL: Breach of company rules and policies – Claimant posting comments on his Facebook page in his freetime and using his own internet facility – Whether the claimant had posted comments on his Facebook page, in breach of the Company’s Policy and Code – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Whether his comments had used derogatory words in relation to the company’s management and those holding management positions – Effect of – Whether his actions had compromised the reputation and integrity of the company – Whether the relationship of mutual trust and confidence that had been placed in him as an employee had been broken by him – Whether the allegation had successfully been proven by the company against him – Claimant’s defence – Whether acceptable – Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse

DISMISSAL: Misconduct – Claimant referring to the company’s management as “lembu” on his FB page – Whether it had been an insult to it – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Whether it had constituted major misconduct – Whether the misconduct had been proven by the company against him – Claimant’s defence – Whether could be accepted – Whether the company had acted reasonably in dismissing him – Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 3 of 2021)
Award Parties Citation Links
  Nor Aziz Mat Isa v. Sun Teoh Tia (SAC) & Ors
[Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-38-11-2019(W)]
[2021] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw
labourlaw
43/2021 Abdul Mutalib Mohamad v. SWM Greentech Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 16/4-1646/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 493 cljlaw
labourlaw
93/2021 Jeana Yeo See Nah v. Virgoz Oils & Fats Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 7/4-2388/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 516 cljlaw
labourlaw
138/2021 Wan Adhwa Aizat Wan Musa v. Safeguards G4S Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 19/4-1108/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 527 cljlaw
labourlaw
151/2021 Thomas Kuruvilla v. Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 4/4-143/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 539 cljlaw
labourlaw
157/2021 Mohd Noresham Mohamad Esa v. First Engineering Plastics (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 16/4-203/20]
[2021] 1 ILR 568 cljlaw
labourlaw
220/2021 Mohd Hafizul Abdul Rahim v. Malaysia Airlines Berhad
[Case No: 16/4-2134/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 579 cljlaw
labourlaw
242/2021 Wong Chew Mei v. Maxxima Resources (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 19/4-1830/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 592 cljlaw
labourlaw
256/2021 Charles Selvam Andrew Francis v. Kebabangan Petroleum Operating Company Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 20/4-88/19]
[2021] 1 ILR 601 cljlaw
labourlaw
To Subject Index
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHT

UNIVERSITY WARDEN SACKED FOR ‘AGGRESSIVE’ TEXT MESSAGES WAS UNFAIRLY DISMISSED, TRIBUNAL RULES
Warden was unfairly dismissed, compensation cut because of 'blunt' communications
A lecturer accused of sending “aggressive” messages to colleagues has been awarded £15,000 for unfair dismissal after an employment tribunal ruled there had not been a proper investigation into the allegations made against him. Sitting at the Leicester Hearing Centre, employment judge Adkinson said there had not been so much as the “beginning of an investigation” into a number of allegations made against Dr Binoy Sobnack by his employer, Loughborough University.

Read More

UK SUPERMARKET CHAIN ASDA LOSES RULING OVER EQUAL PAY CLAIM
Asda workers can potentially win years of back pay
More than 40,000 store workers at Asda, Britain's third-largest supermarket chain, can proceed with their yearslong claim for equal pay following a ruling Friday from the U.K. Supreme Court. The workers, around two-thirds of whom are women, first brought a sex discrimination claim in 2014. They complained that Asda staff members working in distribution depots, who are mostly men, were getting paid more.

Read More

Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd Unsubscribe