If you can't view the message, please click here.

IN THIS ISSUE BULLETIN 09/2016
www.cljlaw.com
www.mylawbox.com
www.labourlawbox.com
www.clj-ebooks.com
(Available with separate subscription plan)

banner banner banner banner banner
LATEST HIGHLIGHTS
CASE HIGHLIGHTS

MOHAMMAD FARIS BASRI & ORS v. ANSELL NP SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
HAPIPAH MONEL
AWARD NO. 875 OF 2016 [CASE NO: 19/4-276/13]
29 JULY 2016

DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Illegal picketing - Claimants' actions - Whether it had been in breach of s. 40(1)(a) to (c) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 - What they should have done - Whether their actions had been in contravention of the spirit and intention of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 - Perusal of the Act - Effect of - Whether they had been selectively prosecuted by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 40(1)(a) to (c)

DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - When is it lawful to picket - Factors to consider - Evaluation of legislation - Effect of - Whether a trade dispute had existed in this case - What a trade dispute meant - Whether a smoking zone had been a term and condition of the claimants' terms of employment - Perusal of the CA - Effect of - Whether the pickets had been illegal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 40

DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Whether the claimants had participated in illegal pickets - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Claimants admitting to it at various stages of the proceedings - Whether it had constituted misconduct serious enough to justify their dismissals - Whether their dismissals had been carried out with just cause and excuse

DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Whether the pickets had been unlawful - Factors to consider - Whether the claimants had been aware that the dispute over the CA had been referred to the IC at the material time - Evidence adduced - Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement - When a trade dispute exists - Factors to consider - Whether one had existed in the present case - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of

HASRI HASHIM & SATU LAGI KES lwn. HICOM AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN, KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD ROSLI MOHD SHAM
DUNCAN SIKODOL
AWARD NO. 900 TAHUN 2016 [NO. KES: 11/4-452/13]
8 OGOS 2016

KETERANGAN: Keterangan dokumentari - Nota Siasatan Dalaman - Sama ada sah dan tepat - Faktor-Faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya

MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN: Bidang kuasa - Sama ada Mahkamah Perusahaan mempunyai bidang kuasa untuk mendengar kes ini - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Sama ada keterangan dengan jelas menunjukkan bahawa YM tidak ingin dikembalikan kepada pekerjaan mereka - Kesannya

PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi syarikat - Kesalahan moral - Sama ada ianya menjadi sebahagian daripada dasar atau polisi syarikat yang pekerja perlu patuhi - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada ia menjadi sebahagian daripada syarat kontrak pekerjaan YM - Kesannya - Sama ada salah laku tersebut tergolong kepada salah laku yang berat yang mewajarkan pembuangan kerja YM

PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Salah laku - YM didakwa melakukan khalwat - Sama ada kesalahan moral tergolong kepada salah laku pekerjaan - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada dibuktikan oleh pihak syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Sama ada salah laku tersebut mewajarkan pembuangan kerja YM - Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 9 of 2016)
Award Parties Citation Links
MISC Haulage Services Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Mohd Ali Awang & Ors [Judicial Review No: 25-45-05-2015] [2016] 3 ILR 453 cljlaw
labourlaw
816/2016 Ngu Kie Dung v. Subur Tiasa Holdings Berhad [Case No: 8/4-1037/10] [2016] 3 ILR 465 cljlaw
labourlaw
835/2016 Liew Hon Leong & Satu Lagi lwn. Uniplaster Marketing Sdn Berhad [No. Kes: 10/4-1033/13] [2016] 3 ILR 487 cljlaw
labourlaw
846/2016 Saratha Ramiah v. Atlantic Forwarding (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [No. Kes: 21(26)/4-1378/13] [2016] 3 ILR 513 cljlaw
labourlaw
852/2016 Hamizul Karnain Hasani v. Toyochem Specialty Chemical Sdn Bhd [Case No: 19(24)/4-815/12] [2016] 3 ILR 529 cljlaw
labourlaw
874/2016 Joseph Daniel Devanesan v. Atlas Lines Services (M) Sdn Bhd [Case No: 19/4-663/13] [2016] 3 ILR 536 cljlaw
labourlaw
875/2016 Mohammad Faris Basri & Ors v. Ansell NP Sdn Bhd [Case No: 19/4-276/13] [2016] 3 ILR 546 cljlaw
labourlaw
880/2016 Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perkilangan Perusahaan Makanan v. F & N Dairies Manufacturing Sdn Bhd [Case No: 3(1)/6-683/16] [2016] 3 ILR 582 cljlaw
labourlaw
893/2016 Aminudin Shuib lwn. Kedah Bioresources Corporation Sdn Bhd [No. Kes: 9/4-128/14] [2016] 3 ILR 591 cljlaw
labourlaw
896/2016 Sarguna Silan S Manokarian v. Freightwatch Malaysia Sdn Bhd [Case No: 9/4-1194/12] [2016] 3 ILR 598 cljlaw
labourlaw
900/2016 Hasri Hashim & Satu Lagi Kes lwn. Hicom Automotive Manufacturers (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd [No. Kes: 11/4-452/13] [2016] 3 ILR 604 cljlaw
labourlaw
902/2016 Haslinda Haja Mohideen lwn. Persatuan Daybreak Untuk Kebajikan Orang-orang Cacat Kinta Perak [No. Kes: 10/4-553/13] [2016] 3 ILR 612 cljlaw
labourlaw
930/2016 Noorazmi Omar v. IBM Malaysia Sdn Bhd [Case No: 7/4-1382/13] [2016] 3 ILR 640 cljlaw
labourlaw
To Subject Index
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHT

DISMISSAL FOR DISRUPTIVE AND DISORDERLY BEHAVIOUR AT THE WORKPLACE: A REVIEW OF HARIANTO EFFENDY ZAKARIA & ORS v. MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR
by: ASHGAR ALI ALI MOHAMED

Introduction

Employees are generally expected to treat their superiors, co-workers and their employer’s customers with respect and dignity. Disruptive and disorderly behaviour which interferes with the functions and flow of the workplace is prohibited. Some examples of disruptive and disorderly behaviour at the workplace are demeaning conversations and communications, the use of profane or disrespectful language, cursing, yelling, screaming, shouting in anger, belittling or being insulting, throwing objects at others, waving arms or fists, bullying and being intimidating.

Read More
MEDIA INFO
Articles
As a leader, are you a motivator? (The Star, Malaysia)

Have you been in a situation where you have just been promoted to become a team leader and have been given the responsibility to manage a group of individuals?

Stress Management
Work stress doubles risk of heart disease (New Straits Times, Malaysia)

Workplace stress must be looked upon seriously because if left untreated, it can double the risk of heart disease.

Tips
Making an impact with your resume (The Star, Malaysia)

Trends and times are changing and so should your resume. Here is my list of resume trends for this year.

Working Smart
Positive attitudes in the workplace (The Star, Malaysia)

You are looking for a career booster. You are possibly past your first year mark at work. You have somewhat learned the ropes of your position but you feel you are slowing down.

View Other Media Info...

Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd Subscribe | Unsubscribe