MOHAMMAD FARIS BASRI & ORS v. ANSELL NP SDN BHD INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR HAPIPAH MONEL AWARD NO. 875 OF 2016 [CASE NO: 19/4-276/13] 29 JULY 2016
DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Illegal picketing - Claimants' actions - Whether it had been in breach of s. 40(1)(a) to (c) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 - What they should have done - Whether their actions had been in contravention of the spirit and intention of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 - Perusal of the Act - Effect of - Whether they had been selectively prosecuted by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 40(1)(a) to (c)
DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - When is it lawful to picket - Factors to consider - Evaluation of legislation - Effect of - Whether a trade dispute had existed in this case - What a trade dispute meant - Whether a smoking zone had been a term and condition of the claimants' terms of employment - Perusal of the CA - Effect of - Whether the pickets had been illegal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 40
DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Whether the claimants had participated in illegal pickets - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Claimants admitting to it at various stages of the proceedings - Whether it had constituted misconduct serious enough to justify their dismissals - Whether their dismissals had been carried out with just cause and excuse
DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Picketing - Whether the pickets had been unlawful - Factors to consider - Whether the claimants had been aware that the dispute over the CA had been referred to the IC at the material time - Evidence adduced - Effect of
TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement - When a trade dispute exists - Factors to consider - Whether one had existed in the present case - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of
HASRI HASHIM & SATU LAGI KES lwn. HICOM AUTOMOTIVE MANUFACTURERS (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN, KUALA LUMPUR AHMAD ROSLI MOHD SHAM DUNCAN SIKODOL AWARD NO. 900 TAHUN 2016 [NO. KES: 11/4-452/13] 8 OGOS 2016
KETERANGAN: Keterangan dokumentari - Nota Siasatan Dalaman - Sama ada sah dan tepat - Faktor-Faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN: Bidang kuasa - Sama ada Mahkamah Perusahaan mempunyai bidang kuasa untuk mendengar kes ini - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Sama ada keterangan dengan jelas menunjukkan bahawa YM tidak ingin dikembalikan kepada pekerjaan mereka - Kesannya
PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi syarikat - Kesalahan moral - Sama ada ianya menjadi sebahagian daripada dasar atau polisi syarikat yang pekerja perlu patuhi - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada ia menjadi sebahagian daripada syarat kontrak pekerjaan YM - Kesannya - Sama ada salah laku tersebut tergolong kepada salah laku yang berat yang mewajarkan pembuangan kerja YM
PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Salah laku - YM didakwa melakukan khalwat - Sama ada kesalahan moral tergolong kepada salah laku pekerjaan - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada dibuktikan oleh pihak syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Sama ada salah laku tersebut mewajarkan pembuangan kerja YM - Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
|