AB HALIM MOHAMED lwn. PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN, JOHOR
ROSLAN MAT NOR
AWARD NO. 581 TAHUN 2015 [NO. KES: 16/4-823/14]
13 MEI 2015
PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Notis penamatan - Penamatan kerja secara paksa - Sama ada YM telah dipaksa meletak jawatan - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Tiada perhubungan secara formal antara YM dengan syarikat berkenaan pengesahan jawatannya - Kesannya - Sama ada dakwaan beliau boleh diterima - Sama ada YM telah dibuang kerja
PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Notis penamatan - Penamatan kerja secara paksa - YM meletak jawatan tetapi menarik balik surat perletakan jawatannya - Dalam keadaan mana ianya boleh diterima - Prinsip undang-undang - Kesannya
PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Notis penamatan - Penamatan kerja secara paksa - YM meletak jawatan tetapi menarik balik surat perletakan jawatannya - Syarikat menerima perletakan jawatan beliau setelah ianya ditarik balik oleh beliau - Kesannya - Sama ada tindakan syarikat tersebut merupakan suatu pembuangan kerja - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada YM telah dibuang kerja
AZMAN IDRUS v. SGA SERVICES (M) SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
SAROJINI KANDASAMY
AWARD NO. 640 OF 2015 [CASE NO: 4(7)(4)/4-589/13]
25 MAY 2015
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Terms and conditions - No clause on the need to furnish proof of qualifications - Whether there had been a need for one - What clauses contracts of employment generally contain - When is there a requirement to show proof of qualifications - No evidence of whether an advertisement had been put up for the post or what had transpired in the job interview in relation to it - Effect of - Whether the claimant had known that he had obtained the job based on his representation that he had been a lawyer
DISMISSAL: Misconduct - Misrepresentation - Whether the claimant had misrepresented himself as a lawyer with experience in practice - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the company had relied on his misrepresentation to give him the post - Requirements of the post - Factors to consider - Effect of - What the claimant should have done - Whether the misconduct had been established against him - Whether it had constituted a breach of the fiduciary relationship between an employer and employee - Whether the company had been reasonable in dismissing him - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
DISMISSAL: Notice of termination - Claimant summarily dismissed - Reasons for the same - Whether he had been aware of the reasons for his dismissal - Claimant failing to write to the company and seek an explanation - What that had reflected - His justification for the same - Whether could be accepted - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence - SMS communications between COW2 and the claimant - Whether it had evidentiary value - SMSes not being objected to by the claimant at the commencement of the hearing - Effect of
|