If you can't view the message, please click here.

IN THIS ISSUE BULLETIN 08/2019
www.cljlaw.com
www.mylawbox.com
www.labourlawbox.com
www.clj-ebooks.com
(Available with separate subscription plan)

LATEST HIGHLIGHTS
CASE HIGHLIGHTS

BALADEVAN NADARAJAN v. PPG PERFORMANCE COATINGS (M) SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
ANDERSEN ONG WAI LEONG
AWARD NO. 1222 OF 2019 [CASE NO: 19(4)(16)/4-1001/16]
17 APRIL 2019

DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal – Benefits – Shell Card benefit – Discontinuance of – Whether it had amounted to a breach of a fundamental term of his contract of employment – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Whether his claim for constructive dismissal ought to be allowed

DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal – Demotion – Claimant re-designated from the position of Acting Plant Manager with the company to Production Manager with PPG Coatings – Whether his re-designation had amounted to a demotion – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Implications of holding an “acting” position – Whether the claimant had held a lien over his “acting” position – Intention of the parties – Whether the company’s actions towards him had been reasonable – Whether it had justified him walking out of his employment and claiming constructive dismissal


KESATUAN KEBANGSAAN PEKERJA-PEKERJA HOTEL, BAR DAN RESTORAN SEMENANJUNG MALAYSIA v. PRIMULA BEACH HOTEL SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
FRANKLIN GOONTING
EMPLOYEES’ PANEL: NOR AZMIN TAJUL ARIFIN
EMPLOYERS’ PANEL: HEZLINA HASHIM
AWARD NO. 1291 OF 2019 [CASE NO: 28(7)/2-462/17]
25 APRIL 2019

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on medically board out – Whether the hotel’s proposal that such payments should be discretionary should be allowed – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on paid leave for trade union courses – Whether the union’s proposal that the hotel is to be notified in writing one (1) week before the commencement of trade union courses, should be allowed – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on retirement benefits – Whether the hotel’s proposal of 30 days of basic salary for each completed year of service, on retirement, had been reasonable – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on salary structure, Appendix A & A1 – Whether union’s proposal of 8% had been justified and reasonable – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on service charge – Whether the union’s proposal for a re-implementation of it should be allowed – Factors to consider – Whether the hotel, by its actions, had unilaterally changed the service charge system to a clean wage one – Evidence adduced – Evaluation of – Effect of – Hotel’s arguments in response including the raising of the doctrine of estoppel – Whether could be accepted – What its actions had shown

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on sick leave and hospitalisation – Whether the union’s proposal for the capping of outpatient treatment should be allowed – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Whether the union had been the successor of the in-house union – Whether it had been bound by the collective agreements entered into by the latter with the hotel – Factors to consider – Effect of – Determination of which collective agreement had been under discussion – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 17

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 07 of 2019)
Award Parties Citation Links
  Arab Malaysian Merchant Bank Bhd & Anor v. Tan Giap How & Another Appeal
[Appeals No: W-02(A)-1498-08-2016 & W-02(A)-1541-08-2016]
[2019] 3 ILR 1 cljlaw
labourlaw
  Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd v. Menteri Sumber Manusia, Malaysia & Ors
[Civil Appeal No: W-01(A)-449-11-2016]
[2019] 3 ILR 16 cljlaw
labourlaw
1222/2019 Baladevan Nadarajan v. PPG Performance Coatings (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 19(4)(16)/4-1001/16]
[2019] 3 ILR 28 cljlaw
labourlaw
1236/2019 Kesatuan Eksekutif Resort World Bhd v. Genting Malaysia Berhad
[Case No: 3/3-1429/17]
[2019] 3 ILR 38 cljlaw
labourlaw
1284/2019 Dhev Kumar Raghavan @ Shagban v. Gabungan Dewan Perniagaan Dan Perindustrian India Malaysia
[Case No: 25(21)/4-695/16]
[2019] 3 ILR 50 cljlaw
labourlaw
1291/2019 Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-pekerja Hotel, Bar Dan Restoran Semenanjung Malaysia v. Primula Beach Hotel Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 28(7)/2-462/17]
[2019] 3 ILR 67 cljlaw
labourlaw
1303/2019 Zulhisham Ayob & Anor v. Perunding Pakar Media Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 27(12)(24)/4-481/11]
[2019] 3 ILR 105 cljlaw
labourlaw
1334/2019 Mohamed Haffeez Faidzal Abdul Raub v. Infineon Technologies (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 31(11)/4-1611/18]
[2019] 3 ILR 156 cljlaw
labourlaw
1414/2019 Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-pekerja Perusahaan Alat-alat Pengangkutan Dan Sekutu v. Oriental Summit Industries Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 28(13)/2-12/18]
[2019] 3 ILR 175 cljlaw
labourlaw
To Subject Index
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHT

HR ADMINISTRATOR WAS UNFAIRLY DISMISSED AFTER EMPLOYER FAILED TO CONSULT DURING REDUNDANCY
No proper consultation with Oracle administrator about ways to avoid redundancy
An HR administrator was unfairly dismissed after a tribunal ruled her employer made her redundant and failed to consult with her during a company-wide restructuring exercise. The Reading employment tribunal (ET) found there was no proper consultation with Mrs H Bagri, an HR administrator for Oracle, about ways to avoid redundancy. Judge Andrew Gumbiti-Zimuto rejected Oracle’s arguments that Bagri’s role as an HR professional meant she would have “[complained] about inadequate consultation”, and the fact that Bagri did not do so “showed there was an adequate consultation”. An additional complaint of breach of contract was dismissed.

Read More

ISRAEL FOLAU: SACKED PLAYER SUES RUGBY AUSTRALIA OVER ANTI-GAY ROW
Sacked rugby player's case may set legal precedent for national employment law
Sacked rugby player Israel Folau has launched court action against Rugby Australia (RA) in a case which may set a legal precedent for religious expression in Australian workplaces. The former Wallabies player was fired in May after he wrote on social media that "hell awaits" gay people. He argues his contract was unlawfully ended due to his Christian beliefs. Australian rugby officials maintain that Folau breached a players' code of conduct. Mediation attempts in Australia's main workplace relations tribunal broke down in June.

Read More

Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd Subscribe/Unsubscribe