SUBJECT INDEX
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
Judicial review – Certiorari – Appeal – Claimants resident engineers
employed on fixed term contract of employment – Review by Government
on large-scale projects resulted in significant changes to project – Project
changes from project delivery partner model to turnkey or 'design and build'
contract – Project's organisational chart and site supervision staff
restructured – Claimants identified as redundant and retrenched – Industrial
Court held in claimants' favour and awarded compensation – High Court
quashed Industrial Court's awards – Whether there was genuine need for
retrenchment
Yap Chin Wah v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor And Other Appeals
(S Nantha Balan, Azman Abdullah & Azmi Ariffin JJCA) [2025] 3 ILR 471

COURTS
Industrial Court – Awards – Monetary relief – Awards for constructive
dismissal – Claimant employed on fixed-term contract – Claimant dismissed
from employment before expiry of contract – Claimant sought salary for
unexpired balance of fixed term contract – Whether monetary relief
extended to awarding entire balance of fixed-term contract – Industrial
Relations Act 1967, s. 30(5)
Noor Azri Firdaus Noor Azman v. Orient BB Sdn Bhd
(Zalina Awang) [2025] 3 ILR 502

EVIDENCE
Hearsay – Dismissal of employees – Claimants terminated from services for
alleged misconduct of, inter alia, impersonating as another company's staff
and thieving information – Whether alleged misconducts proven – Whether
alleged misconducts based on hearsay evidence
Grace Yong Yee Fui & Anor v. Hock Sheng Resources Sdn Bhd
(Indra Ayub) [2025] 3 ILR 579

LABOUR LAW
Employment – Dismissal – Claimants terminated from services for alleged
misconducts of impersonating as another company's staff, thieving
information and defiling director of company – Whether alleged misconducts
proven – Whether there was credible evidence to support allegations –
Whether evidence hearsay – Whether punishment proportionate to alleged
misconducts – Whether claimants dismissed with just cause or excuse –
Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Grace Yong Yee Fui & Anor v. Hock Sheng Resources Sdn Bhd
(Indra Ayub) [2025] 3 ILR 579

Employment – Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Forced resignation –
Claimant employed on fixed-term service contract – Claimant informed that
he was underperforming and that he would be dismissed if he did not resign
– Claimant advised to tender resignation to avoid damage to future
employment prospects – Whether sequence of events pointed to resignation
under duress and coercion – Whether there was documentary evidence of
prior warnings, performance reviews or poor key performance indicators
(KPI) to support basis for dismissal – Whether claimant's resignation
prompted by employer's threat of dismissal – Whether there was clear
violation of principles of natural justice – Whether claimant accorded right
to be heard before termination – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse
– Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Noor Azri Firdaus Noor Azman v. Orient BB Sdn Bhd
(Zalina Awang) [2025] 3 ILR 502

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Employee served as Security
Officer – Employee allegedly not found at security post on two separate
occasions and did not wear complete uniform during duty hours despite
being warned – Employee terminated for alleged misconduct – No
investigation or domestic inquiry by employer – Whether employee
dismissed with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Muruges Supramaniam v. The Vanguards Services Sdn Bhd
(Vanithamany Sivalingam) [2025] 3 ILR 664

Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Violent and aggressive behaviour
– Employee uttered vulgar words and attempted physical attack on superior
– Employee dismissed from employment – Whether employee's conduct
constituted misconduct warranting disciplinary action – Whether occurred at
workplace and during working hours – Whether venue and time of relevance
– Whether confrontation arose out of work-related issue – Whether dismissal
with just cause or excuse – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3)
Mohammad Huzaini Abdul Manaf v. Percetakan Mun Sun Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2025] 3 ILR 641

Employment – Dismissal – Retrenchment – Redundancy – Allegation of
discrimination in selection process for retrenchment – Whether employee
discriminated against – Whether retrenchment exercise bona fide – Whether
there was redundancy warranting retrenchment – Whether there was
justification for retrenchment – Whether employee had become surplus to
organisational and operational needs – Whether selection criteria fair –
Whether employee failed to avail herself of job opportunities available
within organisation – Whether employee entitled to retrenchment benefits –
Whether employee within scope of Employment Act 1955
Lim Lai Yin v. The British Council
(Jeyaseelen T Anthony) [2025] 3 ILR 603

Employment – Dismissal – Retrenchment – Redundancy – Claimants
resident engineers employed on fixed term contract of employment – Review
by Government on large-scale projects resulted in significant changes to
project – Project changes from project delivery partner model to turnkey or
'design and build' contract – Project's organisational chart and site
supervision staff restructured – Claimants identified as redundant and
retrenched – Whether there was redundancy – Whether bona fide redundancy
arose – Whether there was surplus of labour due to legitimate business needs
– Whether fact that job continued to exist meant that there was no genuine
need for retrenchment – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20
Yap Chin Wah v. Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor And Other Appeals
(S Nantha Balan, Azman Abdullah & Azmi Ariffin JJCA) [2025] 3 ILR 471

Trade dispute – Salary adjustment – Selective salary adjustment – Salary
adjustment not based on collective agreement but based on comparative
study approved by Ministry of Finance – Factors considered in handing
down award – Public interest – Financial implications and effect of award
on economy of country and industry concerned – Probable effect in related
or similar industries – Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 26(2) & 30(4), (5)
Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad Sarawak v. Bank
Pertanian Malaysia Berhad
(Mohd Taufik Mohd Yusoff) [2025] 3 ILR 523

TRADE DISPUTE
Salary adjustment – Selective salary adjustment – Salary adjustment not
based on collective agreement but based on comparative study approved by
Ministry of Finance – Whether valid exercise of managerial prerogative –
Whether discriminatory and unfair labour practice – Whether initiative
serves legitimate business purpose – Whether criteria for eligibility and
method of calculation objective and applied consistently – Whether initiative
violated terms of any existing collective or employment agreements –
Whether would cause negative financial implications – Industrial Relations
Act 1967, ss. 26(2) & 30(4), (5)
Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad Sarawak v. Bank
Pertanian Malaysia Berhad
(Mohd Taufik Mohd Yusoff) [2025] 3 ILR 523

INDEKS PERKARA
UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH
Pekerjaan – Penamatan – Pembuangan kerja secara tidak adil – Pekerja
melakukan kesalahan-kesalahan antara 2016 hingga 2019 serta 2023 –
Pekerja telah dimaafkan dan dihukum untuk kesalahan-kesalahan lampau –
Pekerja akhirnya dibuang kerja atas kesalahan yang dilakukan pada 2023 –
Sama ada pertuduhan-pertuduhan kesalahan yang dikenakan atas pekerja
adalah berhubung dengan tugasan yang termasuk dalam skop kerjanya –
Prinsip 'double jeopardy' – Sama ada salah laku terdahulu mempunyai kaitan
dengan pertuduhan yang dikenakan terhadap pekerja yang membawa pada
pembuangan kerja – Sama ada majikan boleh merujuk salah laku lampau
yang telah dihukum untuk menjustifikasi pembuangan kerja bagi salah laku
baharu – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 20(3)
Azian Saad lwn. Koperasi Guru-guru Melayu Kedah Berhad
(Rusita Md Lazim) [2025] 3 ILR 554
