LLB Bulletin Header
LLB Bulletin #03/2023 07 March 2023

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 2 of 2023)

SUBJECT INDEX

LABOUR LAW

Deductions – Salary – Charges of misconduct against claimant/employee – Issuance of unauthorised credit advancement to customer – Frequent absenteeism and failure to observe hours of duty as per employment contract – Employee demoted and salary adjusted following finding of guilt of misconduct – Whether employer had right to demote or downgrade employee – Whether breach of employment contract
Georgiana Chai Siaw Vun v. Lekamas Sdn Bhd
(Zulhelmy Hasan) [2023] 1 ILR 371 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Allegation of – Charges of misconduct against claimant/employee – Issuance of unauthorised credit advancement to customer – Frequent absenteeism and failure to observe hours of duty as per employment contract – Employee demoted and salary adjusted following finding of guilt of misconduct – Whether employee constructively dismissed – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse
Georgiana Chai Siaw Vun v. Lekamas Sdn Bhd
(Zulhelmy Hasan) [2023] 1 ILR 371 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Allegations of – Employee/claimant issued with warning letters – Allegations that claimant had committed fraud – Unreasonable petrol claims and negligence towards company by giving customer bad image of company – Whether there was constructive dismissal – Whether company committed fundamental breach of essential terms of employment contract – Whether claimant placed company on sufficient notice period to give time to company to remedy defect
Toh Chin Yong v. RISB Products Sdn Bhd
(Suraiya Mustafa Kamal) [2023] 1 ILR 305 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Claimant/employee dismissed from employment on grounds of serious misconduct – Claim for reinstatement to former position without any loss of wages, allowances, privileges and any other benefits – Whether employee discharged duty to employer – Whether charges proven – Whether charges properly framed – Whether dismissal was with just cause or excuse – Whether reinstatement to former position appropriate
Maznida Mohamad v. Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd
(Syed Noh Said Nazir) [2023] 1 ILR 345 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Dismissal without just cause or excuse – Allegations of – Claimant involved in tender process committee of housing development project – Discovery that claimant employed by company that submitted tender – Whether claimant had placed himself in position of conflict with interests of company – Whether directly/indirectly involved or had interest in dealings or activities of enterprise/business without approval from company – Whether claimant failed to disclose contractual or noncontractual interests – Claimant found guilty of misconduct – Claimant’s service with company terminated – Whether dismissal done in good faith – Whether company had engaged in unfair labour practices
Ghazali Abdullah v. FGV Plantations (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Augustine Anthony) [2023] 1 ILR 278 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Retirement – Company issued letter of retirement to claimant – Employee/claimant 62 years and nine months during issuance of letter – Claimant did not object to letter – Whether claimant, who had surpassed statutory minimum age of 60, could be retired by company – Whether claimant’s contract of employment prescribed retirement clause – Whether claimant’s termination by way of retirement made with just cause and excuse – Whether claimant eligible to be reinstated to his former position in company – Whether compensation in lieu of reinstatement and backwages could be awarded to claimant if reinstatement could not be ordered – Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012, s. 4(1)
Manokaran S Mahalingam v. Hiap Hoe Cranes & Engineering (M) Sdn Bhd
(Azwarnida Affandi) [2023] 1 ILR 329 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Termination of service – Claimant/employee appointed by way of contract – Non-renewal of employment contract – Whether employment contract genuine fixed-term contract – Whether employment on permanent basis – Whether issue of dismissal arose – Whether non-renewal of employment contract carried out in accordance with fair labour practice
Jacqueline Joseph v. University College Sabah Foundation
(Indra Ayub) [2023] 1 ILR 261 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment – Employment contract – Non-payment of salary and other statutory contributions – Whether fundamental breach of employment contract – Whether claimant/employee constructively dismissed – Claim for balance wages under contract – Whether employee constructively dismissed – Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse
Mohd Azmi Mohd Yaacob v. Mutiara Smart Sdn Bhd
(Vanithamany Sivalingam) [2023] 1 ILR 364 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment – Probation – Termination – Claimant placed under probation for three months – Claimant’s employment with company terminated in less than one month – Allegations of poor work performance and display of erratic and unfriendly behaviour – Whether valid grounds for termination – Whether there was dismissal – Whether dismissal with just cause or exercise
Chong Siew Yee v. RNB Engineering (Asia) Sdn Bhd
(Sumathi Murugiah) [2023] 1 ILR 321 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment contract – Termination of service – Claimant/employee appointed by way of contract – Non-renewal of employment contract – Whether employment contract genuine fixed-term contract – Whether nonrenewal of employment contract carried out in accordance with fair labour practice
Jacqueline Joseph v. University College Sabah Foundation
(Indra Ayub) [2023] 1 ILR 261 cljlaw labourlaw

INDEKS PERKARA

UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH

Pemberhentian kerja – Pengurangan pekerja – Pihak menuntut bekerja sebagai disc jockey (DJ) di kelab hiburan – Penutupan kelab hiburan semasa Perintah Kawalan Pergerakan susulan pandemik COVID-19 – Kemerosotan ekonomi – Dalihan bahawa fungsi pihak menuntut tidak diperlukan – Sama ada pihak menuntut pekerja lebihan – Sama ada pemberhentian kerja pihak menuntut atas sebab atau alasan adil
J Mogan Joseph lwn. Ghazal Mahel Sdn Bhd
(Sumathi Murugiah) [2023] 1 ILR 300 cljlaw labourlaw

Penamatan perkhidmatan – Tuntutan – Penularan pandemik COVID-19 – Syarikat membuat perubahan pada struktur organisasi dengan mengurangkan tenaga kerja – Perkhidmatan pihak menuntut ditamatkan atas faktor lebihan pekerja – Sama ada pihak menuntut diberi makluman awal tentang tindakan syarikat – Sama ada pihak menuntut dipaksa menandatangani surat penamatan perkhidmatan – Sama ada pihak menuntut menandatangani surat penamatan perkhidmatan secara sukarela – Sama ada penamatan kerja pihak menuntut dibuat dengan sebab atau alasan adil
Shahriman Ahmad Shafie lwn. MRCB Builders Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Zulbahrin Zainuddin) [2023] 1 ILR 247 cljlaw labourlaw

Copyright © 2023 MYLAWBOX Sdn Bhd To unsubscribe click here