BULLETIN 03/2016

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 3 of 2016)

SUBJECT INDEX

CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT

Terms and conditions - Allowances - Claimant making claims for his car instalment payments, his housing loan, his property rental, air tickets and Director's fees - Whether he had been entitled to them - Factors to consider - Perusal of his contract of employment - Effect of
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Terms and conditions - Notice of termination - Whether the claimant had been terminated by the company - Claimant alleging that he had still been an employee of the company - Company issuing him a termination notice - Perusal of
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Terms and conditions - Resignation - Whether the claimants had resigned voluntarily - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether they had been entitled to walk out of their employment
Amir Osman & Ors v. Meor Hamzah (M) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 508 cljlaw labourlaw

Terms and conditions - Retirement age - Whether the 2nd claimant had retired from the company - Factors to consider - Perusal of the 2nd claimant's employment contract - Whether it had contained a retirement clause - Conduct of the company towards its other employees - Effect of - Company asking the 2nd claimant to come back to work after he had reached 60 - What that had shown
Amir Osman & Ors v. Meor Hamzah (M) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 508 cljlaw labourlaw

Terms and conditions - Transfer - Whether the claimant's contract of employment had contained a transfer clause - Perusal of her contract - Effect of - Whether she had signed a new contract with the Group - Evidence adduced - Whether she could be transferred unilaterally by the company - Factors to consider - Whether her transfer had been carried out lawfully
Ng Bee Yoong v. Capital Development Sdn Bhd
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 609 cljlaw labourlaw

Terms and conditions - Whether the claimants had been bound by the CA - Factors to consider - Claimants not union members - Effect of
Amir Riduan Zakaria & Anor v. Pokka Ace (M) Sdn Bhd
(Mary Shakila G Azariah) [2016] 1 ILR 577 cljlaw labourlaw

Type of - Fixed term contract - Whether the 2nd and 3rd claimants had been contract workers - Factors to consider - Company's actions towards them - Whether the company had put them under the guise of fixed term contracts which had been renewable each year
Amir Osman & Ors v. Meor Hamzah (M) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 508 cljlaw labourlaw

DISMISSAL

Breach of company rules and policies - Dishonesty - Claimant submitting a false dental claim to the bank - Whether it had been a breach of the bank's policy - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether he had been aware that it had been against the bank's policy - His explanations - Whether could be accepted - Whether the claimant's conduct had been serious - Whether it had been severe enough to warrant dismissal - Whether it had justified the bank dismissing him - Factors to consider - Whether the amount of the losses suffered had been a relevant consideration - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Augustin Simon v. Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad (AGROBANK)
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw labourlaw

Breach of company rules and policies - Dishonesty - Claimant submitting a false claim to the bank - Whether proven by the bank - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether this charge had been proven by the bank - Factors to consider - Whether this had been a serious misconduct - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Augustin Simon v. Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad (AGROBANK)
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw labourlaw

Constructive dismissal - Demotion - Claimant transferred to a downgraded portfolio - Claimant objecting to it - Claimant not reporting for duty in downgraded position - Whether she had jumped the gun in claiming constructive dismissal - Whether an anticipatory breach had been sufficient to claim constructive dismissal
Ng Bee Yoong v. Capital Development Sdn Bhd
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 609 cljlaw labourlaw

Constructive dismissal - Salary - Claimants not paid salaries for four months - Whether proven by the claimants - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of - Effect of - Conduct of the company - Whether it had amounted to a fundamental breach going to the root of the contracts of employment - Whether the claimants had been constructively dismissed - Whether dismissals without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Amir Osman & Ors v. Meor Hamzah (M) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 508 cljlaw labourlaw

Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Claimant the only one being transferred - Whether the transfer had been carried out with mala fide intent - Whether she had been victimised vide the transfer - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the claimant had satisfied the requirements of constructive dismissal - Whether the company had carried out the transfer bona fide - Whether the company's actions had constituted an intention to no longer be bound by the contract of service
Ng Bee Yoong v. Capital Development Sdn Bhd
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 609 cljlaw labourlaw

Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Claimant transferred to a company within the Group - Whether she had been bound by it - Whether there had existed a unity of group enterprise between the Group, the company, PGB and PNBC - Whether they had been separate legal entities - Factors to consider - Whether she had been bound by the Group's terms and conditions of employment - No express transfer clause in her employment contract - Whether could be implied - Whether her consent had been required before she could be transferred - Whether the company unilaterally transferring her had been a breach of a fundamental term of her contract of employment - Whether the company had evinced an intention not to be bound by it - Effect of - Whether the claimant had been constructively dismissed - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
Ng Bee Yoong v. Capital Development Sdn Bhd
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 609 cljlaw labourlaw

Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Reasons for the transfer - Whether bona fide - Whether the company's actions towards her had been reasonable - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the claimant had been constructively dismissed
Ng Bee Yoong v. Capital Development Sdn Bhd
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 609 cljlaw labourlaw

Insubordination - Claimants failing to turn up for overtime duty despite signing the Overtime Request Form - Whether they had been in breach of the CA - Perusal of the CA - Effect of - Whether it had been a serious misconduct - Whether they had known the consequences of their action towards the company - The claimants' years of experience as Boilermen - Whether the company had been right in dismissing them - Factors to consider - Whether dismissals without just cause and excuse
Amir Riduan Zakaria & Anor v. Pokka Ace (M) Sdn Bhd
(Mary Shakila G Azariah) [2016] 1 ILR 577 cljlaw labourlaw

Insubordination - Claimants failing to turn up for overtime duty on 15 January 2011 - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Their explanations - Whether it could be accepted - Factors to consider - Effect of - Their attitude and conduct in dealing with the matter - Whether it had been good for industrial harmony - Whether the company had been justified in dismissing them - Whether dismissals without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Amir Riduan Zakaria & Anor v. Pokka Ace (M) Sdn Bhd
(Mary Shakila G Azariah) [2016] 1 ILR 577 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimant charged with several incidents of serious misconduct - Her explanations and attitude to the same - Whether acceptable - What she should have done - Position held by the claimant in the company and her seniority - Repercussions of her actions - Effect of - Whether the company had acted fairly towards her - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimant issuing a Letter of Demand and a Winding-Up notice for his outstanding salaries to the company - Whether it had constituted misconduct - Whether proven by the company - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether it had constituted a grave and serious misconduct - Whether he had been in breach of his fiduciary duties to the company - Whether his misconduct had been serious enough to justify his dismissal - Perusal of the claimant's contract of employment - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimant obtaining pre-signed statement recording sheets from the insured - Repercussions of the same - Whether it had been serious for the company - Whether there had been a company policy in place - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the claimant had been aware of it - Claimant's attitude - Whether it had been a serious misconduct - Claimant's explanations - Whether acceptable - Whether it had warranted his dismissal - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
John Joseph Fernandez v. Mestari Adjusters Sdn Bhd
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 521 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Whether the claimant had been in breach of her duties and obligations to the company - Charges brought against the claimant - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the charges had constituted serious misconduct - Factors to consider - Whether the company had acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether an actual redundancy situation had existed in the company - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of
Lee Chee Shang v. Jabil Circuit Sdn Bhd
(Fredrick Indran XA Nicholas) [2016] 1 ILR 457 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether he had been offered alternative employment within the company - Evidence adduced - Whether redundancy had clearly been an excuse to get rid of him
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether his job had become redundant - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of - Factors to consider - Effect of
Lee Chee Shang v. Jabil Circuit Sdn Bhd
(Fredrick Indran XA Nicholas) [2016] 1 ILR 457 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether the selection of the claimant for retrenchment had been carried out bona fide - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced by the company - Effect of
Lee Chee Shang v. Jabil Circuit Sdn Bhd
(Fredrick Indran XA Nicholas) [2016] 1 ILR 457 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether the claimant had possessed the required experience and skill set to spearhead the new business plan with regard to sukuk funds - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the claimant's removal had been an excuse to replace him with COW1's candidate of choice - Whether that had shown mala fide intent on the part of the company
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether the claimant's role in the company had ceased to exist - Evidence adduced - Claimant's functions and duties transferred to another - Effect of - Whether he had been surplus to the company's needs - Factors to consider - Company's actions towards him - Whether it had been fair
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant retrenched - Whether the retrenchment had been carried out bona fide - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced by the company - Effect of - Whether the claimant's replacement had been better suited for the job - Claimant's skill set - Whether the claimant had been given the opportunity to handle the sukuk funds - What the company should have done
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

DOMESTIC INQUIRY

Charges - Different charges in show cause letter and Notice of DI - Whether it had deprived the claimant of her right to be heard - Factors to consider
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

Charges - Whether some of the charges had lacked material details - Whether it had deprived the claimant of an opportunity to defend herself properly - Factors to consider - Effect of
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedural impropriety - Charge in show cause letter and DI different - Whether it had rendered the DI defective - Factors to consider - Whether the claimant had been prejudiced
John Joseph Fernandez v. Mestari Adjusters Sdn Bhd
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 521 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedural impropriety - Two notices of DI issued against the claimant - Whether it had rendered the DI defective - Factors to consider
John Joseph Fernandez v. Mestari Adjusters Sdn Bhd
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 521 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedural impropriety - Whether the DI conducted had been defective, improper and perverse - Factors to consider
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

EVIDENCE

Adverse inference - Non-production of a material witness - Company failing to call Ahmad Sobri - Whether the burden had been on the company to call him as a witness - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether an adverse inference ought to be drawn against the company - Evidence Act 1950, ss. 101 & 114(g)
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Burden of proof - Whether discharged by the company - Factors to consider
Lee Chee Shang v. Jabil Circuit Sdn Bhd
(Fredrick Indran XA Nicholas) [2016] 1 ILR 457 cljlaw labourlaw

Burden of proof - Whether discharged by the company - Factors to consider
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Documentary evidence - Findings of the DI - Whether the rules of natural justice had been followed - Factors to consider
John Joseph Fernandez v. Mestari Adjusters Sdn Bhd
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 521 cljlaw labourlaw

Documentary evidence - Notes of the DI - Company failing to provide the verbatim notes of the DI to the claimant - Effect of
Tan Beng Hoong v. Legacy Delight Sdn Bhd/Pacific Regency Hotel Suites
(Sarojini Kandasamy) [2016] 1 ILR 645 cljlaw labourlaw

Witness - Credibility - What the claimant's evidence had shown - Whether he had been a credible witness - Factors to consider - Whether the bank's case had been made out against him - Effect of
Augustin Simon v. Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad (AGROBANK)
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw labourlaw

Witness - Credibility - Whether the claimant and CLW1 had been credible witnesses - Factors to consider
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

INDUSTRIAL COURT

Jurisdiction - Whether the Industrial Court had the jurisdiction to hear this matter - Factors to consider - Whether the claimant had been terminated by the company - Effect of
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedure - Action - Whether the claimant had filed his claims for outstanding salaries in the proper forum - Factors to consider - Effect of - What he should have done
Norbert Finger v. Santina Resort (TRG) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 596 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedure - Pleadings - Claimant raising matters not pleaded at the hearing of the matter - Whether it should be allowed into evidence - Factors to consider - Effect of
Augustin Simon v. Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad (AGROBANK)
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw labourlaw

Remedies - Compensation - Claimant seeking EPF payments - Whether ought to be allowed - Factors to consider - Determination of quantum
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Remedies - Compensation - Compensation in lieu of reinstatement - Whether suitable to award - Claimant with the company for less than a year - Effect of
Lee Chee Shang v. Jabil Circuit Sdn Bhd
(Fredrick Indran XA Nicholas) [2016] 1 ILR 457 cljlaw labourlaw

Remedies - Compensation - Quantum of damages - Backwages - Whether the claimants ought to be awarded 24 months - Factors to consider - Claimants asked to go back to work for the company but refusing - Reasons for the same - Effect of - Whether they should have gone back and mitigated their losses
Amir Osman & Ors v. Meor Hamzah (M) Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2016] 1 ILR 508 cljlaw labourlaw

Remedies - Compensation in lieu of reinstatement - Whether should include punitive compensation - Factors to consider - What would be a reasonable amount to award
Sivabalan Poobalasingam v. Kuwait Finance House (Malaysia) Berhad
(Jamhirah Ali) [2016] 1 ILR 542 cljlaw labourlaw

Remedies - Punishment - Whether dismissal had been too harsh under the circumstances - Claimant having an unblemished employment record with the bank for 28 years - Effect of - What other factors needed to be taken into consideration
Augustin Simon v. Bank Pertanian Malaysia Berhad (AGROBANK)
(Duncan Sikodol) [2016] 1 ILR 481 cljlaw labourlaw

INDEKS PERKARA

KONTRAK PERKHIDMATAN

Jenis - Kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap - Sama ada kontrak YM merupakan satu kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap YM adalah tulen - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya
Mohd Syahini Hassan lwn. Media Prima Sdn Bhd/Primeworks Studios Sdn Bhd
(Siti Salwa Musa) [2016] 1 ILR 537 cljlaw labourlaw

Jenis - Kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap - Sama ada tindakan syarikat tidak melanjutkan kontrak YM mempunyai unsur mala fide atau merupakan satu amalan pekerjaan yang tidak adil - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya
Mohd Syahini Hassan lwn. Media Prima Sdn Bhd/Primeworks Studios Sdn Bhd
(Siti Salwa Musa) [2016] 1 ILR 537 cljlaw labourlaw

MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN

Prosedur - Prosiding ex-parte - Syarikat gagal hadir ke mahkamah berulang kali - Sama ada prosiding harus dijalankan secara ex-parte - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 29(d)
Yusniza Yusof lwn. Yee Chan Loong (CL Aluminium)
(Gulam Muhiaddeen Abdul Aziz) [2016] 1 ILR 493 cljlaw labourlaw

Prosedur - Tindakan - Pendengaran secara de novo - Sama ada harus dibenarkan - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya
Ahmad Mohd Khairuddin lwn. Global Knowledge Network (M) Sdn Bhd
(Rosenani Abd Rahman) [2016] 1 ILR 593 cljlaw labourlaw

PEMBUANGAN KERJA

Ketidakpatuhan terhadap peraturan dan polisi syarikat - Ketidakjujuran - Sama ada YM telah mengeluarkan invois palsu - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Penjelasan beliau - Sama ada dapat diterima - Kesannya - Sama ada pertuduhan ini berjaya dibuktikan oleh syarikat terhadapnya - Sama ada salah laku ini merupakan satu salah laku yang serius yang mewajarkan beliau ditamatkan perkhidmatannya - Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab
Rika Novia Zayardin lwn. Koperasi Kakitangan Petronas Berhad (KOPETRO)
(Sapini Mat Saman) [2016] 1 ILR 563 cljlaw labourlaw

Ketidakpatuhan terhadap peraturan dan polisi syarikat - Ketidakjujuran - Sama ada YM telah menggunakan perkhidmatan pihak ketiga tanpa kebenaran syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Penjelasan YM - Sama ada dapat diterima - Sama ada pertuduhan ini berjaya dibuktikan oleh syarikat terhadapnya - Sama ada salah laku ini merupakan salah laku yang serius - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Rika Novia Zayardin lwn. Koperasi Kakitangan Petronas Berhad (KOPETRO)
(Sapini Mat Saman) [2016] 1 ILR 563 cljlaw labourlaw

Notis penamatan - Notis yang tidak memadai - Syarikat gagal untuk memberi satu bulan notis kepada YM berkenaan penamatan kontraknya - Sama ada syarikat wajib memberikan notis kepada beliau - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Penelitian terma-terma kontrak antara YM dan syarikat - Kesannya - Sama ada pihak syarikat telah melanggar perjanjian pekerjaannya dengan YM
Mohd Syahini Hassan lwn. Media Prima Sdn Bhd/Primeworks Studios Sdn Bhd
(Siti Salwa Musa) [2016] 1 ILR 537 cljlaw labourlaw

Penghematan - Penutupan perniagaan - Syarikat menutup perniagaannya - Alasan syarikat untuk menutup perniagaannya - Sama ada berjaya dibuktikan oleh syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM berdasarkan alasan ini adalah munasabah - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Sama ada syarikat telah mematuhi peruntukan undang-undang buruh dan juga Code of Conduct For Industrial Harmony - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab
Azhar Abdul Mutalib & Yang Lain lwn. Polymatech (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Rosenani Abd Rahman) [2016] 1 ILR 499 cljlaw labourlaw

Penghematan - Penutupan perniagaan - Syarikat menutup perniagaannya - Sama ada syarikat mempunyai obligasi untuk memindahkan pekerjanya ke entiti-entitinya dalam kumpulan syarikatnya yang bertapak di luar negara - Sama ada praktikal atau munasabah untuk memindahkan YM kepada entiti-entiti tersebut - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya
Azhar Abdul Mutalib & Yang Lain lwn. Polymatech (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Rosenani Abd Rahman) [2016] 1 ILR 499 cljlaw labourlaw

Penghematan - Penutupan perniagaan - Syarikat menutup perniagaannya - Sama ada YM sedar akan kedudukan kewangan syarikat pada masa yang material - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - YM tidak membantah apabila menerima surat daripada syarikat berkenaan penutupan operasinya - Kesannya - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab
Azhar Abdul Mutalib & Yang Lain lwn. Polymatech (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Rosenani Abd Rahman) [2016] 1 ILR 499 cljlaw labourlaw

SIASATAN DALAMAN

Kesilapan prosedur - Sama ada SD telah dijalankan secara teratur dan sah - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya
Rika Novia Zayardin lwn. Koperasi Kakitangan Petronas Berhad (KOPETRO)
(Sapini Mat Saman) [2016] 1 ILR 563 cljlaw labourlaw

Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd Subscribe | Unsubscribe